On the level
 A new SoR policy covers the disclosure of information about members to police or counter fraud services.
“There have been high profile cases in the past where agencies and organisations have been criticised for withholding information about someone who subsequently went on to commit a criminal offence,” explained Richard Evans, CEO.
“The implication is that the information held might have alerted the police or other authorities in time to prevent the crime. Well known cases have included the Harold Shipman murders and the Soham murders.”
As a membership organisation with representative functions, the SoR receives information from and about its members. This information is confidential and the way in which the organisation handles it is governed by the Data Protection Act. However, the act allows for information that may imply criminal activity to be disclosed without consent.
“It is important for our members to be confident that we will not disclose confidential information,” said Richard.
“This policy deals with the exceptional theoretical situation that we may discover information about serious criminal activity. Those members who we represent at hearings and tribunals should be able to feel confident that they can be open and honest with SoR reps and staff so that they can give the best advice and make the most effective representation.”
While he recognises the sensitivity of the issue, Richard hopes that all members will appreciate the public duty that the SoR has not to knowingly withhold information that might indicate criminal activity, or that the member (or anyone else it may have information on) may represent a threat to public safety.
“We also have a duty to consider the good name of the profession and of the Society. They would be compromised if we were perceived to have held back details that might have helped to keep a crime from being committed,” he added.
The full policy can be viewed at www.sor.org/fullurl
Back | Top
|
